The United Nations (UN) seeks Digital IDs for all, among numerous other Power-Grabs

by Dan Fournier, Commentary, published Saturday, June 17, 11:25 EDT on fournier.substack.com

Here we go again folks.

The mad push to control every single aspect of our lives by the unelected supranational organisations such as the United Nations (UN), World Health Organisation (WHO), and the World Economic Forum (WEF) NEVER STOPS!

Until we get uncle Jed to shoot these parasites out of their miserable existence behind the woodshed, we are stuck with their insane, evil, and lunatic plans for world domination and a one-world-government.

Kidding aside, Reclaim The Net reports the latest iteration which mostly centers on the UN’s objective of linking peoples’ bank accounts with their Digital ID. But that is not the only power they seek with their Common Agenda Policy Brief 5 Global Digital Compact – an Open, Free and Secure

Digital Future for All (click for PDF) published in May of this year.

The 32-page report outlines, in the usual coded and deceptive manner, the advances they propose to make the world a glorious utopia with zero poverty and a sustainable sustainable sustainable sustainable sustainable sustainable sustainable, equitable equitable equitable equitable equitable equitable equitable equitable, and diverse diverse diverse diverse diverse diverse diverse diverse future for humanity (these are but three of the most annoyingly overused terms they have been using ad nauseum to brainwash the masses in to unquestioning obedience).

The same diarrheal verbiage can be found in the UN’s 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).  

Though the majority of the masses around the world have figured out the true intentions and meanings behind these so-called goals, country leaders – inside and outside the G20 – have nonetheless committed to selling their souls to the devil by acquiescing to cede national sovereignty to the UN & WHO.

Deciphering the blueprint for global tyranny and domination

The UN’s 2030 Agenda and its broad Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have been in existence for several years now. While to the untrained eye, they might, at prima facie, appear to be noble and honorable goals to help humanity, they are in fact designed to do the opposite.

While many have written about these SDGs and translated their meanings, including a very thorough and enlightening work by investigative journalist Whitney Webb, it is worth re-visiting them to see how they intend to further consolidate their power to control and enslave the masses.

Here is a review of the broad SDG goals:

To wit, let us have a look at some of these specific goals/objectives (read power grabs) the UN seeks by examining selected ones stated in their Common Agenda Policy Brief 5 Global Digital Compact – an Open, Free and Secure Digital Future for All document. They appear in Figure II GLOBAL DIGITAL COOPERATION AND THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS.

As alluded to earlier, the authors who write these documents often use coded-language to signal to their partners in crime and complicit governments (who very well understand their real meanings) their true intentions.

Accordingly, I will help the reader decipher, or decode, what is really meant by these goals.

Let’s have a look at some of the most important ones.

Goals 1 & 10 are tied at the hip and the phrase “mobile money” is common to both and essentially means a CBDC, or Central Bank Digital Currency – which will be explained in a moment.

Isn’t it strange, though, that there only seem to be girls that are displaced or “excluded from financial services,” and not boys?

The first objective, “NO POVERTY” is impossible. There will always be poverty. And in fact, it will increase if ever the SDGs ever get fully implemented.

This author has previously written about Digital IDs and related concerns they bring about. One of the main objectives they have is for each nation to implement its own Digital ID in order to tie it to a CBDC – which can be either national, or, eventually, global. Once the two are tied together, it is game over for individual privacy and financial sovereignty.

The key phrase to decode here is “linked with bank or mobile money accounts.” Sure, a Digital ID can conceivably be linked to one’s bank account, but with the “mobile money accounts,” they are referring to digital money, or a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).

In my recent 40 page exposé on a global CBDC that is currently being developed, I warned about the traps and pitfalls that a CBDC would have on individuals and businesses. I invite the reader to consult specifically their characteristics, concerns and apprehensions therein to learn and understand how utterly destructive this would be.

Goal 3 really has to do with vaccines and how to increase their development and usage.

When they say “platform-based vaccine technologies” they are referring to centralised databases which would hold information about peoples’ vaccine status; in other words, their personal and private medical information.

We have seen during the Covid-19 Pandemic how many countries and regions (such as the European Union) imposed travel restrictions through vaccine passports.

In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently decided that they were going to implement to member nations a global vaccine passport system based on the European Union’s model which is set to expire at the end of this month. 

In other words, if you don’t take whichever new vaccines that the WHO decides to impose, you are likely to be prohibited from traveling.

Worse, the WHO has actually admitted that they are planning to introduce 500 new vaccines by 2030, as is stated in their own Immunization Agenda 2030 (IA2030) program (archived here).

Are you all starting to see the profit motive and medical tyranny the UN and its subsidiary in the WHO wish to impose on you?

Goals 4 & 5 are aligned together.

For goal 4 “Quality Education,” the key phrase is “align curricula with internationally recognized standards,” which will be explained or deciphered in a minute.  

And for goal 5 “Gender Equality,” the key phrases are “access to information” & “access support services”, and “learn about sexual and reproductive health.” These are code words for indoctrinating knowledge about and for access to abortion services – which is a form of population control. In addition, learning about “sexual health” (while not entirely bad) is maliciously aligned with goal 5 which is explained hereunder.

In a recent article titled The UN, WHO, & WEF seek to Sexualize, Exploit, & Decriminalize Sex with School-Aged Children, I wrote about how these unelected supranational organisations seek to take control of sexual education of children with very egregious “standards” as well as how they want to legalise pedophilia – sex with children – essentially subverting countries’ legal and criminal provisions which exist to protect children from such predators.

In that article, I also pointed to a former high-level employee, now turned whistleblower, of the UN who warned us that the UN is essentially a criminal organisation run by pedophiles. Here is the video if you want to hear it from the former insider.

The verbiage used in this fourth goal is highly deceptive. In reality, it comprises a very dark agenda aimed at indoctrinating, grooming, and even sterilising our precious children.

Goals 11 & 13 are closely related.

Let’s start with goal 13 “Climate Action.”

Firstly, their claims that “technology solutions” – whatever that means – can “cut nearly 10 times more carbon dioxide than they emit” is both extremely vague and meaningless. And that “digital technologies” and “ecological design” can reduce natural materials use by “up to 90 per cent” is also ridiculous and completely unfounded.

But more importantly, the so-called Climate Agenda is merely a great deception to further impoverish the masses by the imposition of egregious carbon taxes.

In goal 11, by “intelligent systems deploying information from remote sensors to guide traffic signals and maximize the efficient flow of commuters in urban areas,” they are talking about two things: 15-minute cities and future restrictions on mobility of individuals (especially in their motor vehicles).

There is already a test-run in place in Oxfordshire, England whereby drivers are restricted from traveling outside their “designated limits” (as detected by such remote sensors) once they have passed a certain allowable distance for travel.

Such types of travel restrictions would essentially amount to Climate Change-related lockdowns.

The implementation of such “Intelligent systems” to monitor commuters’ travel distances could prove abhorrent at best.

Both the UN and WEF (with their Global Future Council on the Future of Cities and their Global New Mobility Coalition) are hard at work trying to bring about Chinese-style “smart cities,” a.k.a. “15-minute cities".

The Climate Scam Hoax has been going on for years now and is based on faulty science, mammoth amounts of highly NGO-funded propaganda, and complicit governments ready to carbon tax their citizens into oblivion to enrich a global cabal of thieves.

For goal 12 “Responsible Consumption and Production,” the key phrases are “the Internet of things” and “big data.”

The Internet of things (IoT) refers to how smart devices such as your cell phone or pad/notebook (including all their apps), home appliances, automobile, and personal electronic devices collect data and are in one way or another connected to the internet, and thus to databases to permanently record your personal information and actions.

These “big data” centers are used by various entities – such as private corporations, banks, financial service providers, and intelligence agencies, to name a few – to tailor targeted advertising messages to you and also to monitor your behaviour patterns and habits (spending, movements, online actions, etc.)  

As was explained by the International Monetary Fund (IMF)’s Deputy Managing Director Bo Li, such Big Data would (already is) be collected to serve as the basis for a credit-score system like which currently exists in China.

With a CBDC ecosystem which is already being developped by governments and central banks worldwide, private corporations will have access to people’s private personal and financial data – usually without their knowledge or consent.

Your consumption and travel habits as siloed in Big Data databases could be used against you. You’ve eaten too much red meat this month and have exceeded your prescribed individual carbon footprint limit? Then you may be carbon-taxed or see your digital money turned off.

The same could happen if you have driven too much with your motor vehicle, as per your allowable carbon emissions limit (which is what they seek to impose in the future).

This is all part of the WEF’s “Responsible Consumption” plan.

It is important to note that the UN and WEF currently have a strategic partnership agreement

signed back in 2019.

Secretary-General António Guterres (right) meets with Professor Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum to sign the 2019 Strategic Partnership Agreement. Photo credit and copyright: United Nations Photo/Manuel Elías.

It must be re-emphasised that the individuals directing the policies and actions of the United Nations (UN), its subsidiary in the WHO, and those from the WEF have never been elected by the citizens. As such, they should not be able to dictate all these important facets of our lives, and should definitely not be able to exert such a high level of power and influence.

Needless to say, the amount of personal, financial, and private information collected on us and shared with an endless amount of public and private participants is scary at best. Increased amounts of such data shared as sought by goal 12 would prove ripe for even more abuses and be highly destructive on people’s rights and privileges.

The only thing I want to mention here about goal 14 is the ridiculous claim they make in that there exists “5 trillion pieces of ocean plastic trash.”

Five trillion?

How stupid do they think we are?

For goal 16, by “e-government services” they are referring to the aforementioned Digital IDs.

And by creating “data that allow[s] public institutions to target needs more effectively,” they are referring to Big Data, as described above, and how it can be monitored and used against you.

Who are the “public institutions” they are referring to exactly? And what “needs” are they targeting?

To “reduce waste” implies that our carbon footprints could be tracked and that we could be imposed limits on consumption and travel, as was described previously.

Remember, we are the carbon they wish to eliminate in their depopulation efforts.

The final, 17^th goal, “Partnerships between States, private sector,” is key. Here, they are again referring to private entities (corporations) that would have access to your personal data.

Once again, these private entities can have access to your private information without your knowledge or consent.

By “for disaster response,” they could be referring to how responding to so-called Climate Change “crises” would entail the shared use of your personal data, with your “carbon footprint” serving as one example.

Concluding thoughts

As the Reclaim the Net article states, the UN is “basically regulating [your] global digital future.”

“It’s having people, devices, entities, all tied up in a connected network that could apparently be centrally administered,” they add.

They also warn about a possible governing body to manage it all called “the apex body” (as is described in the UN’s “Policy Brief 6” document):

“As far as the UN’s “vision” for a future global financial system, it is supposed to be harmonized with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and would be governed by something called “the apex body” that is yet to be set up.”

The “future global financial system” sought and currently being developped has already been thoroughly described in my 40-page exposé by this author which is dystopian at its core.

They also state that the key actors here would be the UN chief, as well as the Group of 20, Economic and Social Council, and “heads of international financial institutions.”

By the latter of these key actors, they are referring to the “heads of international financial institutions.”

These international financial institutions are those in the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) which I have all described in detail in my 40-page exposé.

There, you will see that these are essentially tantamount to criminal organisations with total immunity from prosecution which do not have the best interest of global citizens at heart, but are rather intent on plundering and sucking their economic energy to enrich themselves.

The evidence I have provided therein is clear, highly evidenced, and indisputable.

Share this warning far and wide.

In Peace & Liberty,

Most articles are free, but please support the work of this independent journalist by considering a paid subscription to his Substack (for only $5 a month, or $50 a year) and following his Twitter. You can also buy him a coffee.

Tweet this article

Share this article on Facebook

Disclaimer:

See the author’s About page for full disclaimer.