This pas Monday, May 14, 2024, I was fortunate enough to be on the highly-viewed SGTReport broadcast with its host Sean based in the United States.
This was my third appearance on this show.
Dan Fournier's Inconvenient Truths is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
My previous two appearances can be viewed hereunder:
Censorship Gone Wild (Canada: Bill C-63 / USA: TikTok bill & HR 6090)
History repeating (the Holocaust / The White Rose)
5th Generation Warfare (our Militaries waging war against We The People)
The Rule of Law (Some wins in Canadian courts)
Geoengineering
The Puppet Masters (Rich Families & Banksters controlling it all)
I thus wanted to share some key resources that we referenced to in the broadcast which are presented hereunder.
1. Censorship Gone Wild
Sean started by playing a video from a tweet showing how Bill C-63 (short named the Online Harms Act)in Canada is probably the most dystopian bill ever concocted in Canadian history.
Though this article by the renowned author also shows the hellish pitfalls of the bill, I somewhat pushed back on the piece questioning why journalists such as Matt Taibi never seem to identify and expose the parties behind such misdoings.
In short, with their accomplices such as long-time Canadian media figure Edward Greenspon – who is an Editorial Advisor for NewsGuard, Newsguard is nothing more than a cloaked U.S. military operation used to control news narratives which align with the globalists’ nefarious agendas. (more on 5th Generation Warfare in Section 3 of this post below).
2. History repeating
During our talk, I also mentioned how history is repeating itself.
I told Sean that earlier that same morning I had just interviewed first-generation Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav who warned that the same level of fear-induced brainwashing and sheeple-like behaviour witnessed during World War Two of the masses is tragically being repeating today.
I asked Sean if he was familiar with a group called The White Rose which he hadn’t heard about (like most).
I explained that The White Rosewas a group of young German resisters (to Hitler’s fascist regime) who tried to warn and wake up their fellow citizens to get them out of their obedient stupor.
I also cited a passage from the 1st Leaflet produced by young German members of the resistance group:
“Goethe speaks of the Germans as a tragic nation, like the Jews and the Greeks. But these days, Germans appear more like a shallow, irresolute herd of opportunists who have had all the marrow sucked from their bones. Now that they have been robbed of their essence, they are willing to be pursued to their destruction. This is how it appears, but it is not so. Rather, every individual has been jailed in an intellectual prison after having been slowly, deceptively, and systematically raped. Only as he lies there in chains is he aware of his doom. A few recognized the pending perdition [for what it was]. The reward for their heroic exhortations was death. There is more to say about the fate of these people.” - Leaflet 1”
I also told Sean that just that very same morning there had been news that young Germans would be required to register for the Military Draft, otherwise they would be required to do one year of unpaid work – which is slavery!
To learn more about The White Rose, you can check out the related section in my podcast Show Notes from my interview with Vera Sharav – who also gives an overview of the group and how this sordid history is repeating in one of my video shorts:
3. 5th Generation Warfare: How the US & Canadian Militaries are Waging War Against Us
Regarding the topic of Information Warfare, I mentioned that I was recently on a panel alongside Dr. Robert Malone who, though known mostly for his expertise on mRNA technology, also gives talks about 5th Generation Warfare.
I then expanded on how both the U.S. and Canadian Militaries are waging war on We The People – with full receipts of course which are reproduced hereunder.
U.S. Military
We touched upon the aspect of “Operation Mockingbird 2.0” (for the original version see my previous reporting here), or Fake News / Narrative Control / Social Media Warfare – which is essentially the notion that the vast majority of our news and narratives are controlled through military type operations (a taster was provided earlier with NewsGuard).
These are essentially covert military operations that use geographically dispersed (meaning around the world) U.S. Combatant Commanders to conduct operations which seek to control various news organisations, including those in alternative media who have gained significant audiences (such as SGTReport).
I had provide Sean with a link to a three-page June 8, 2007 Memorandum by the U.S. Secretary of Defense Gordon England outlining the operation.
Here are the three pages along with emphasis added (in red) which I drew attention to:
Note from Page 1 above that “public affairs activity” is code word for disseminating propaganda. Moreover, the Scope of this program entails said activities with the specific purpose of shaping viewers’ emotions, reasoning, motives, and behaviours; in other words, it is a type of psychological conditioning which is a form of mind control.
On Page 2, we can clearly see that “public affairs personnel” (i.e., those contracted by the U.S. Military) engage with Interactive Internet Activities (IIAs) with journalists.
In addition, we can also observe that Combatant Commanders can make the determination of when certain outlets (such as SGTReport) can be deemed the “equivalent” to a [mainstream] news organisation. In other words, such outlets can be targeted for censorship and similar type actions.
On Page 3 in section 2) it basically outlines a cooperation with a “partner nation” to conduct IIAs; while in section 3) which they label “Non-Attribution” it means that such operations can be conducted without the other nation’s knowledge or cooperation/authorisation.
Of course, there are legal implications for the U.S. Military to be conducting such kinds of invasive operations that can infringe on citizens’ rights.
Even the U.S. Army published an article outlining these [supposed] limitations.
The article cites two key documents as guidance for these psychological operations: the aforementioned Memorandum from June 8, 2007 and also the Policy for Combatant Command (COCOM) Regional Websites Tailored to Foreign Audiences (dated August 3, 2007) – which is essentially comprised of fabricating foreign websites for propaganda/information misdirection purposes. It is difficult to say which particular websites have been established through these operations; but, needless to say, they must be a lot more omnipresent than we think.
For the former, June 8, policy the article notes:
“In other words, the IIA guidance authorizes methods that enable DOD personnel to personally engage with foreign audiences and respond directly to Internet postings, e-mail, and online statements.”
Put another way, it confirms that U.S. military personnel are infiltrated in social media to make postings, respond to emails and blog posts, and the like.
Furthermore, the U.S. Army article also confirms which specific unit is responsible for the IIAs and how they no longer require senior-level Department [of Defense] approval [with some emphasis and links added]:
“The thrust of the IIA policy rests in a delegation of authority from the Deputy Secretary of Defense to the Geographic Combatant Commanders (and Commander, US Special Operations Command [USSOCOM] when designated as the supported commander) to approve IIA "in support of their operations and public affairs activities. The significance of this delegation cannot be overstated. Contrary to two decades of practice, the delegation empowers commanders to conduct information operations at their discretion. Previously they had to seek senior-level Department approval.
In essence, this means that a Combatant Commander who wishes to blog on an Arab Web site or exchange e-mails with a Muslim commentator may do so without additional approval.”
The example shown in the second paragraph cited above leaves little to the imagination on how these U.S. combatants and personnel can be in a position to foment hatred, division, promote racism, and so on.
Whether it is the conflict between Russian and Ukraine, or Israel and Palestine, we can easily see how these types of operations can sew chaos and cause tremendous levels of anxiety and division among the affected parties.
There’s a lot more to the U.S. Army article, but I think the reader gets the general gist of these types of operations.
The video fittingly asks: Who is [really] pulling the strings?
Canadian Military / NATO Canada
I told Sean that Canada has even more sophisticated operations, citing some recent (2021) endeavours by the the Canadian Military and NATO Canada with regards to this particular type of 5th Generation Warfare operations.
I read/cited a few key parts from that article to convey how our own military here in The Great White North are on-board with waging a mind war against use unsuspecting Canadians. How lovely.
Here are some of those key excerpts:
The Project Censored article interestingly noted Canada’s role in the project [with emphasis and links added]:
“On October 5, 2021, the NATO Association of Canada (NAOC) sponsored a forum on what panelists described as the “weaponization of brain sciences” to exploit “vulnerabilities of the human brain”in service of more sophisticated forms of social engineering and control. As Ben Norton reported for the Grayzone, “with its development of cognitive warfare strategies,” NATO has added a new, sixth level to the five operational domains—air, land, sea, space, and cyber—that the alliances’ member nations have previously sought to control.”
“The NAOC panel discussion was part of NATO’s Fall 2021 Innovation Challenge, hosted by Canada, which sought to enlist the expertise of private entrepreneurs and academic researchers “to help develop new tactics and technologies for the military alliance,” Ben Norton reported. (The NAOC, he noted, is technically a nongovernmental organization, but “its mission is to promote NATO.”)”
From a related article we also have the following notable passage which describes the manner in which NATO’s Fall 2021 Innovation Challenge, hosted by Canada, seeks to operate:
““Cognitive warfare seeks to change not only what people think, but also how they act,” the Canadian government wrote in its official statement on the challenge. “Attacks against the cognitive domain involve the integration of cyber, disinformation/misinformation, psychological, and social-engineering capabilities.””
“Ottawa’s press release continued: “Cognitive warfare positions the mind as a battle space and contested domain. Its objective is to sow dissonance, instigate conflicting narratives, polarize opinion, and radicalize groups. Cognitive warfare can motivate people to act in ways that can disrupt or fragment an otherwise cohesive society.””
As can be seen from what is shown above, there is little doubt that much of the polarization, dissonance, radicalisation, and fragmentation of society omnipresent on social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms stems from these types of military operations, or at the very least, are fuelled by them.
Can you all start to see what I mean by our own Military outfits are being weaponised against us?
The CAJ award article references how the Department of National Defence (DND) took three years to respond to an Access to Information Request (like a FOIA in the U.S.), and that their response essentially returned “1,700 blank pages.”
Well, now for the good news. Justice Richard G. Mosley of the Federal Court of Canada in Ottawa rendered a decision this past January which ruled the invocation of the Emergencies Act ultra vires.
Ultra vires is a legal term which in this case means the Government was acting beyond its power or authority.
In addition, I mentioned a separate legal proceeding that was announced against the Trudeau Government.
On February 14 of this year, law firm Loberg Ector LLPannouncedlegal proceedings against the Trudeau Government for its misuse of the provisions of the Emergencies Act during the Freedom Convoy Protest which took place in Ottawa in February of 2022.
Defendants also include a long list of Canadian banks and financial institutions who had frozen bank accounts of some of the Plaintiffs.
It will certainly be interesting to see what comes of the case. I am currently writing an article about this case which I plan to publish next month.
5. Geoengineering
On yet another topic of interest, I mentioned to Sean how the Climate Crooks are attempting to extort trillions of dollars in Carbon Taxes for environmental/atmospheric messes that they themselves have created.
I referred to my fourth and last installment (Part 4) of my investigative series on geoengineering.
In this part of the discussion, I mentioned the following [with emphasis added]:
It’s not on 100% of the flights, but on those who are doing it, it produces what is called contrail cirrus – which what most people would describe as chemtrails. After many minutes and hours these trails disperse into persistent large wispy cirrus-like artificial cloudswhich then blanket the sky.
The intent and justification for doing this is to block the suns rays from reaching the earth. They do this almost only during the day and not at night since they say, quote: “We want more contrail-induced cirrus clouds by day, and none by night,” for an optimal cooling effect.
Thanks to the help of geoengineering expert Jim Lee from the US, I have meticulously documented the various documents from international agencies – such as the International Civil Aviation Organization, the ICAO, a United Nations agency which provide indisputable evidence of their nefarious, intentional, doings.
In their own words from one of their reports, the Royal Aeronautical Society (based in London): “the current overall effect of contrails and contrail cirrus is a net warming – about 1.5 times that of aviation’s C02”.
This is a smoking gun because it affirms that what they are doing is actually having the opposite effect of what they claim to want. It’s warming things, not cooling it.”
Dan Fournier's Inconvenient Truths is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
David Hughes has a very accurate perspective, I think:
"The decision by a numerically tiny transnational ruling class to use its control over the means of production to wage war against the rest of humanity is as desperate as it is audacious, and can only be understood in the context of 150 + years of transnational class conflict. The rise of inter- national socialism in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was met with ruthless methods of suppression, including world war, paramilitary brutality, fascism, and totalitarianism (van der Pijl, 2015, 2019; Sutton, 2016). After World War II, similarly ruthless methods were used to crush any sign of emergent socialism in “Third World” countries under the pretext of fighting a “Cold War” against the Soviet Union (McCoy, 2015; Ahmed, 2012, pp. 70–1; Hughes, 2022b). Social tensions mounted in the West, and following May 1968, when France was brought to the brink of revolution, low-level counterinsurgency methods came to be deployed against Western populations (Minnicino, 1974; Ganser, 2005; Hughes, 2022b). From that point on, it was clear that an ongoing, transnation- ally coordinated effort to suppress class conflict had to take precedence over rivalries between different ruling classes and that, ultimately, only a global scientific dictatorship can prevent worldwide social revolution. The ARPANET (the military precursor of the internet, created in 1969) has since evolved into a global surveillance dragnet collecting data on
1 COUNTERREVOLUTION, TECHNOCRACY, WWIII 3
everyone for counter-revolutionary purposes (van der Pijl, 2022, p. 73). The “War on Terror” was used to normalise the invocation of emer- gency powers (Agamben, 2005), militarise the domestic environment (Valentine, 2017), and hollow out liberal democracy.
The transnational ruling class now seeks to replace liberal democ- racy with technocracy. Historically, such fundamental sociopolitical and economic change has only been possible through world war. Thus, the global class war is synonymous with World War III, which, however, looks nothing like the two previous world wars, just as they did not resemble anything seen before (J. Corbett, 2020a). World War III is waged using the novel methods of Omniwar (see below), i.e. war waged across every domain, but clandestinely, so that the public does not recognise it as such. It amounts to a global counterinsurgency campaign, with dissidents replacing “terrorists” as the enemy using the infrastructure established through the “War on Terror” (cf. Valentine, 2017, p. 64). Deception is fundamental: the public must not get wise to what is happening, lest there be a surge in revolutionary activity. So far, physical fighting has not broken out, however, the largest psychological warfare operation in history—the “Covid-19” operation—has been waged against the public, and historically, psychological warfare serves as the prelude to physical war."
--from
David A. Hughes
“Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, Volume 1
Dan, I was spending a moment connecting some dots and thought I would run it by you.
The big pharma is a tool of this plan so is the large increase in childhood vaccinations and prescription drugs intended to sicken and weaken the population to reduce resistance to one world government?
Was the above augmented by the jabs creating more sick people?
The chemtrails have been around for a while, before Gates proposed blocking out the sun. Did they have other purposes such as poisoning the population?
Is the intent of the cabal to destroy the economy so people will be so desperate to eat that they will do whatever the government says?
Does the US intend to release a pandemic in time for the US presidential election so they can mandate mail in voting or voting by computer?
David Hughes has a very accurate perspective, I think:
"The decision by a numerically tiny transnational ruling class to use its control over the means of production to wage war against the rest of humanity is as desperate as it is audacious, and can only be understood in the context of 150 + years of transnational class conflict. The rise of inter- national socialism in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was met with ruthless methods of suppression, including world war, paramilitary brutality, fascism, and totalitarianism (van der Pijl, 2015, 2019; Sutton, 2016). After World War II, similarly ruthless methods were used to crush any sign of emergent socialism in “Third World” countries under the pretext of fighting a “Cold War” against the Soviet Union (McCoy, 2015; Ahmed, 2012, pp. 70–1; Hughes, 2022b). Social tensions mounted in the West, and following May 1968, when France was brought to the brink of revolution, low-level counterinsurgency methods came to be deployed against Western populations (Minnicino, 1974; Ganser, 2005; Hughes, 2022b). From that point on, it was clear that an ongoing, transnation- ally coordinated effort to suppress class conflict had to take precedence over rivalries between different ruling classes and that, ultimately, only a global scientific dictatorship can prevent worldwide social revolution. The ARPANET (the military precursor of the internet, created in 1969) has since evolved into a global surveillance dragnet collecting data on
1 COUNTERREVOLUTION, TECHNOCRACY, WWIII 3
everyone for counter-revolutionary purposes (van der Pijl, 2022, p. 73). The “War on Terror” was used to normalise the invocation of emer- gency powers (Agamben, 2005), militarise the domestic environment (Valentine, 2017), and hollow out liberal democracy.
The transnational ruling class now seeks to replace liberal democ- racy with technocracy. Historically, such fundamental sociopolitical and economic change has only been possible through world war. Thus, the global class war is synonymous with World War III, which, however, looks nothing like the two previous world wars, just as they did not resemble anything seen before (J. Corbett, 2020a). World War III is waged using the novel methods of Omniwar (see below), i.e. war waged across every domain, but clandestinely, so that the public does not recognise it as such. It amounts to a global counterinsurgency campaign, with dissidents replacing “terrorists” as the enemy using the infrastructure established through the “War on Terror” (cf. Valentine, 2017, p. 64). Deception is fundamental: the public must not get wise to what is happening, lest there be a surge in revolutionary activity. So far, physical fighting has not broken out, however, the largest psychological warfare operation in history—the “Covid-19” operation—has been waged against the public, and historically, psychological warfare serves as the prelude to physical war."
--from
David A. Hughes
“Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, Volume 1
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-41850-1.pdf
Dan, I was spending a moment connecting some dots and thought I would run it by you.
The big pharma is a tool of this plan so is the large increase in childhood vaccinations and prescription drugs intended to sicken and weaken the population to reduce resistance to one world government?
Was the above augmented by the jabs creating more sick people?
The chemtrails have been around for a while, before Gates proposed blocking out the sun. Did they have other purposes such as poisoning the population?
Is the intent of the cabal to destroy the economy so people will be so desperate to eat that they will do whatever the government says?
Does the US intend to release a pandemic in time for the US presidential election so they can mandate mail in voting or voting by computer?