This phrase is clearly meant in a factually correct way, but most people will misinterpret it: "the usual animal testing phase was absent for some of the Covid-19 vaccinations". That phase was rushed and not terminated before human trials, which is definitely scandalous enough, but not absent.
As an aside, the intrepid Mathew Crawford has repeatedly stated that the Nuremberg trials were a sham arranged to get the real criminals off the hook by cutting the strings of a couple of patsies. Might be worthwile to look into.
It is my understanding the there was NO animal testing done in Pfizer and Moderna C19 shots prior to their release; if you have any links to official animal trials *before* their releases, please cite and link them below and I will have a look.
My main point on that was Canada blatantly and deceivingly lied when they said that the C19 shots had gone through the *SAME* as any other vax in Canada - which 100% implied that they were animal tested. Which they were not.
As my dad used to say and as a human being, there is nothing I detest more than being lied to in my face.
Indeed, I am not disagreeing with your actual point at all. But a quick online search yields animal testing data from the time before the roll-out of the death shots:
Excellent work! Thank you for substantiating the warning by Vera Sharav (which is her right as a Survivor of the Holocaust, as per "Report to The President", dated Sept. 27, 1979, issued by the "President's Commission on the Holocaust", chaired by Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel).
One small caveat: You write "Another case exhibiting profiteering and conflicts of interest entails of one reported by Deutsche Welle (a German media outfit focused on human right to freedom of expression, education and independent journalism)". Please note that Deutsche Welle is a fully state-sponsored outlet, controlled by the German Government. Whilst this report from 2011 was ok'ed and broadcast, Deutsche Welle today is far from protecting "human rights" or "freedom of expression" and does not publish "independent journalism". Quite to the contrary.
Hi Uwe. Thanks for your kind words. Yes, I am aware that DW is state-owned/controlled and has been for a long time. In my Conspiracy post I also showed an infographic about how the German media has been overtaken (you can see it here: https://swprs.org/netzwerk-medien-deutschland/), similar to the CFR in North America. Generally, when I reference publications, I insert a description to users that I usually get from their "About" pages so as to give them an indication of the type of outlet. I think my viewers are astute enough to know when something is off regardless of the media outlet. But, I've edited it out to avoid possible confusion as to the true nature of DW. Thanks
What an extraordinary undertaking! I had a series of discussions about Holocaust comparisons with a good friend, one of the few people I know who went from being pretty much blue-pilled to astutely sceptical, and I thought we had walked the walk to illuminate the issue. Well, perhaps we did, but you are definitely outwalking us here.
I will properly take the time to read all of this once the series is fully published.
Hi again my friend and thanks for the kind words. It is indeed an ambitious undertaking. All six parts together will likely be in the 250-300 pages (enough to be a book!), and I might assemble it all in a PDF or eBook when it is done; who knows? But, I think it is worth the effort. I find that writing more objectively (even though ALL works contain biased to a degree, including my own - for it is impossible to have any written piece without it) and presenting concrete facts and evidence represents a more effective way to "red pill", or help awaken people to the possibility that a lot of what they hear and are subject to is really contrived by deceitful and powerful elites of the likes who attend Davos, Bilderberg, and their bosses behind them who cowardly lurk in the shadows.
Indeed, if what you are aiming for is journalism, then objectivity regarding the reporting of facts and transparency regarding the author's interpretations are of the essence! I used to think that people knew this, but was proven wrong indeed.
As to what is ultimately effective in informing the public, my mind is still not made up. Factual reporting plays a role, so does asserting opinions in the public square, and humour, including the mean kind, is part of it as well (think "malign creativity"). Time will tell!
All I know is ..ALL we do is talk and NOTHING is done to these dirty evil bastards that are out to kill us!! ..What is it going to take to arrest and hang these scumbags from a tree and make then pay for what they are doing to humanity and people of this world??!!
Many things we can do. I understand your frustration. We never see those criminals get perp walked or convicted, despite very damning evidence against them. The idea is to keep awakening the masses. And once it reaches the tipping point, these people WILL be held accountable. Look at what is happening post-Covid-19. If our elected officials, courts, and law enforcement don't do their job, they will get an angry populous against them that will DEMAND that they do so, lest they be thrown out with the trash. Peace and faith my friend. Godspeed and God bless.
Strong stuff, Dan.
This phrase is clearly meant in a factually correct way, but most people will misinterpret it: "the usual animal testing phase was absent for some of the Covid-19 vaccinations". That phase was rushed and not terminated before human trials, which is definitely scandalous enough, but not absent.
As an aside, the intrepid Mathew Crawford has repeatedly stated that the Nuremberg trials were a sham arranged to get the real criminals off the hook by cutting the strings of a couple of patsies. Might be worthwile to look into.
Thanks for weighing in Momo.
It is my understanding the there was NO animal testing done in Pfizer and Moderna C19 shots prior to their release; if you have any links to official animal trials *before* their releases, please cite and link them below and I will have a look.
My main point on that was Canada blatantly and deceivingly lied when they said that the C19 shots had gone through the *SAME* as any other vax in Canada - which 100% implied that they were animal tested. Which they were not.
As my dad used to say and as a human being, there is nothing I detest more than being lied to in my face.
Indeed, I am not disagreeing with your actual point at all. But a quick online search yields animal testing data from the time before the roll-out of the death shots:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.09.08.280818v1
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7449230/
Excellent work! Thank you for substantiating the warning by Vera Sharav (which is her right as a Survivor of the Holocaust, as per "Report to The President", dated Sept. 27, 1979, issued by the "President's Commission on the Holocaust", chaired by Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel).
One small caveat: You write "Another case exhibiting profiteering and conflicts of interest entails of one reported by Deutsche Welle (a German media outfit focused on human right to freedom of expression, education and independent journalism)". Please note that Deutsche Welle is a fully state-sponsored outlet, controlled by the German Government. Whilst this report from 2011 was ok'ed and broadcast, Deutsche Welle today is far from protecting "human rights" or "freedom of expression" and does not publish "independent journalism". Quite to the contrary.
Hi Uwe. Thanks for your kind words. Yes, I am aware that DW is state-owned/controlled and has been for a long time. In my Conspiracy post I also showed an infographic about how the German media has been overtaken (you can see it here: https://swprs.org/netzwerk-medien-deutschland/), similar to the CFR in North America. Generally, when I reference publications, I insert a description to users that I usually get from their "About" pages so as to give them an indication of the type of outlet. I think my viewers are astute enough to know when something is off regardless of the media outlet. But, I've edited it out to avoid possible confusion as to the true nature of DW. Thanks
What an extraordinary undertaking! I had a series of discussions about Holocaust comparisons with a good friend, one of the few people I know who went from being pretty much blue-pilled to astutely sceptical, and I thought we had walked the walk to illuminate the issue. Well, perhaps we did, but you are definitely outwalking us here.
I will properly take the time to read all of this once the series is fully published.
Hi again my friend and thanks for the kind words. It is indeed an ambitious undertaking. All six parts together will likely be in the 250-300 pages (enough to be a book!), and I might assemble it all in a PDF or eBook when it is done; who knows? But, I think it is worth the effort. I find that writing more objectively (even though ALL works contain biased to a degree, including my own - for it is impossible to have any written piece without it) and presenting concrete facts and evidence represents a more effective way to "red pill", or help awaken people to the possibility that a lot of what they hear and are subject to is really contrived by deceitful and powerful elites of the likes who attend Davos, Bilderberg, and their bosses behind them who cowardly lurk in the shadows.
Indeed, if what you are aiming for is journalism, then objectivity regarding the reporting of facts and transparency regarding the author's interpretations are of the essence! I used to think that people knew this, but was proven wrong indeed.
As to what is ultimately effective in informing the public, my mind is still not made up. Factual reporting plays a role, so does asserting opinions in the public square, and humour, including the mean kind, is part of it as well (think "malign creativity"). Time will tell!
All I know is ..ALL we do is talk and NOTHING is done to these dirty evil bastards that are out to kill us!! ..What is it going to take to arrest and hang these scumbags from a tree and make then pay for what they are doing to humanity and people of this world??!!
Many things we can do. I understand your frustration. We never see those criminals get perp walked or convicted, despite very damning evidence against them. The idea is to keep awakening the masses. And once it reaches the tipping point, these people WILL be held accountable. Look at what is happening post-Covid-19. If our elected officials, courts, and law enforcement don't do their job, they will get an angry populous against them that will DEMAND that they do so, lest they be thrown out with the trash. Peace and faith my friend. Godspeed and God bless.
Very well said! Thank you!!